Hold Your Breath for a Kosovo Deal Next Tuesday

Source: Getty
Strategic Europe
Summary
On April 2, the governments of Serbia and Kosovo could reach agreement on a constitutional modus vivendi. If it happens, this deal will mark a breakthrough for the entire region as well as for the EU’s Catherine Ashton.
Related Media and Tools
 

As April 2 approaches, a few select politicians and civil servants in Brussels, Belgrade, and Pristina are biting their nails down to the skin. They are impatient to see whether on this day, we will finally witness an agreement between the governments of Serbia and Kosovo on a constitutional modus vivendi.

Such a deal would see Pristina’s authority conferred on the territory’s northern enclave of Mitrovica, which is currently administered de facto from Belgrade. What has appeared to be the most insuperable barrier to stability and progress in the former Yugoslavia will have been overcome. This, in turn, should transform the EU’s promise of accession talks for Serbia into a reality.

It is entirely possible that the anticipated agreement collapses at the last minute−hence, the nail-biting. Yet if the agreement is signed and then ratified, it will indicate three things.

First, it will demonstrate that the most senior politicians in Serbia and Kosovo possess a mature statecraft that almost all outside observers would have considered inconceivable; some might even have said congenitally so. By all accounts, the respective prime ministers, Ivica Dacic and Hashim Thaci, have far surpassed expectations of their abilities. Let it also be noted that two Serbian politicians, Tomislav Nikolic, president of Serbia, and Aleksandar Vucic, president of the Serbian Progressive Party, have been vital in allowing the dialogue to develop so fruitfully. Not so long ago, both were members of a political party led by Vojislav Šešelj, an extreme nationalist and war crimes indictee.

Second, the agreement would show that the EU wields an immense and positive influence when it addresses a critical foreign policy issue with a single voice. The primary− and, some would say, sole−mover of this initiative on the European side is Catherine Ashton.

As a consequence of Ashton’s clear guidance to the negotiating parties, we are−for once−not seeing Germans, French, British, Italians, Greeks, and others conspiring against each other in the Balkans to secure some ludicrous advantage or other. Furthermore, the quiet steadfastness and clarity with which Ashton has pursed this agreement has meant that the Americans have not exploited such divisions to further their own foreign policy goals. Until now, that was a persistent problem for Europe with regard to Kosovo in particular.

Third, it is a considerable personal victory for the EU’s High Representative for Foreign and Security Affairs. Even Carl Bildt, Sweden’s foreign minister, who boasts an unparalleled experience of the Balkans, had thought it unlikely that Ashton would be able to pull this one off.

And it wasn’t easy—she did not dictate terms, but persuaded the parties to come to an agreement which they themselves fashioned.

As Ashton stresses, it is not her agreement but theirs. Only when necessary did she step in to explain the parameters or the pros and cons of the tactics deployed by the Serbs and Kosovars. Mostly, she did this alone, but she could bring in other authorities as needed. In ensuring the full backing of Hillary Clinton and then John Kerry for the entire process, Cathy Ashton played a blinder. This has been a European solution to a European problem but with full American buy-in.

Following this achievement, I hope the army of politicians and bureaucrats in several chancelleries of Europe who have been conspiring against Lady Ashton over the years−often in a manner that betrays a sulphuric whiff of misogyny− will give her due recognition in public. It is time they cease the schoolboy sniggering behind her back. I’m not holding my breath on that last point, though.

If an agreement is reached on April 2, Lady Ashton—who was chosen in part because it was assumed that she could easily be manipulated and bullied—will have performed a diplomatic miracle. The implications of a deal go beyond the hitherto intractable issue of Serbia-Kosovo relations. In Bosnia, too, all sides are watching this process slack-jawed. No one in the region believed that such a deal was even a remote possibility. If it comes off, the Bosnians will look like they are dragging their feet intolerably on finding solutions to their own differences, which is exactly what they’re doing.

A Kosovo deal would tally nicely with the one hundredth anniversary of Archduke Franz Ferdinand’s assassination in June next year. If Serbs and Kosovars make peace, the Balkans might finally discard its role as the powder keg of Europe (although I have always maintained that the Balkans was only ever a fuse—the powder keg in 1914 was Europe itself). Then, we could all celebrate 2014 in Sarajevo as the year finally marking an end to the disaster which struck at the beginning of the twentieth century.

Of course, everything could fall through by Tuesday. Yet, even if it does, I just wish to note that Europe came very close to proving that it can alter the fundamental trajectory of an entire region. The EU is certainly far from being a diplomatic pygmy, when it acts with one calm authoritative voice. This is a welcome break from the slow painful process of necrosis that has been characterizing the eurozone crisis.

Misha Glenny is the author of The Balkans: Nationalism, War and the Great Powers, 1804-2012.

End of document

Comments (3)

 
 
  • Doug M.
    Glad I didn't hold my breath.

    More seriously: a win would have been utterly astonishing. None of the states of the lower Balkans have been able to settle their disputes by diplomacy without massive outside pressure and involvement (i.e., the Ohrid Agreement). This would have been a real breakthrough. Which would have been great... but it also means that it was never the way to bet.

    Doug M.
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
    • Guest replies...
      You are wrong!
       
       
  • Truth
    Dear Sir Glenny,

    First I would like to apologize to my poor English, but I am deeply hurt by your text.

    Do you Mr. Glenny little better and more detailed study of wars and crises in the Balkans, where he participated in the Republic of Serbia, as well as migration, both Serbian and Albanian nationality, realized that would have really made a mistake, and saw that the Serbs and Serbia have a proud history behind them.
    Yes, you are right that this world power has always interjected his fingers where they do not belong, and always at the expense of Serbia, as this is happening today. It is an artificial creation of the once famous of Europe with the help of the United States, currently undermines the integrity of the sovereignty of a modern and stable country - Serbia.
    The fact that Serbia is now in chaos, can exclusively be grateful just the European Union and the United States because they were just ripped and shared by Serbia. Everyone in the world is well known lobbying organizations and centers in countries of the European Union and the United States that the frantic disregard Serbia and the Serbian people. And all because Albania and Albanians have their own history and are forced to do so in morbid ways to create a greater Albania its imagined.
    As for Kosovo, just as I wrote above, that's a little better studied the history of the Serbs, they noticed that it was the cradle of Kosovo Serbs and Orthodoxy, and from 1400 to the year before this modern era, consisted of over 90% Serbian population. Ask yourself now, so where is this missing population. Certainly forcibly left Kosovo and not arbitrarily. Would you without any reason leave your home and move somewhere where there was nothing and you knew no one I guess not. But the Serbs were forced, especially in the last 20-30 years, as a result of persecution by the Serbian people in Kosovo Albanian structure, with a large logistics Albania, the United States, European Union and others.
    That's a bit short that you open your eyes and give you an idea of ​​some of the other articles that you write regarding Serbia and Kosovo. I understand that neither you by order strongman will not accept this truth and you will continue to blame the Serbs for everything that's wrong and what's not on your kriterijumoma I will, but the Serbian nation is strong and will withstand everything, just like it says in Serbian Flag (4 S with the flag means - only united Serbs will survive).
     
     
    Reply to this post

     
    Close Panel
Source http://carnegieeurope.euhttp://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=51345

More from The Global Think Tank

In Fact

 

45%

of the Chinese general public

believe their country should share a global leadership role.

30%

of Indian parliamentarians

have criminal cases pending against them.

140

charter schools in the United States

are linked to Turkey’s Gülen movement.

2.5–5

thousand tons of chemical weapons

are in North Korea’s possession.

92%

of import tariffs

among Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru have been eliminated.

$2.34

trillion a year

is unaccounted for in official Chinese income statistics.

37%

of GDP in oil-exporting Arab countries

comes from the mining sector.

72%

of Europeans and Turks

are opposed to intervention in Syria.

90%

of Russian exports to China

are hydrocarbons; machinery accounts for less than 1%.

13%

of undiscovered oil

is in the Arctic.

17

U.S. government shutdowns

occurred between 1976 and 1996.

40%

of Ukrainians

want an “international economic union” with the EU.

120

million electric bicycles

are used in Chinese cities.

60–70%

of the world’s energy supply

is consumed by cities.

58%

of today’s oils

require unconventional extraction techniques.

67%

of the world's population

will reside in cities by 2050.

50%

of Syria’s population

is expected to be displaced by the end of 2013.

18%

of the U.S. economy

is consumed by healthcare.

81%

of Brazilian protesters

learned about a massive rally via Facebook or Twitter.

32

million cases pending

in India’s judicial system.

1 in 3

Syrians

now needs urgent assistance.

370

political parties

contested India’s last national elections.

70%

of Egypt's labor force

works in the private sector.

70%

of oil consumed in the United States

is for the transportation sector.

20%

of Chechnya’s pre-1994 population

has fled to different parts of the world.

58%

of oil consumed in China

was from foreign sources in 2012.

$536

billion in goods and services

traded between the United States and China in 2012.

$100

billion in foreign investment and oil revenue

have been lost by Iran because of its nuclear program.

4700%

increase in China’s GDP per capita

between 1972 and today.

$11

billion have been spent

to complete the Bushehr nuclear reactor in Iran.

2%

of Iran’s electricity needs

is all the Bushehr nuclear reactor provides.

78

journalists

were imprisoned in Turkey as of August 2012 according to the OSCE.

Stay in the Know

Enter your email address in the field below to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!

Personal Information
 
 
Carnegie Europe
 
Carnegie Europe Rue du Congrès, 15 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 2 735 56 50 Fax: +32 2736 6222
Please note...

You are leaving the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy's website and entering another Carnegie global site.

请注意...

您离开卡内基 - 清华全球政策中心网站,进入另一个卡内基全球网站。