• Letter From Paris

    Posted by: François Heisbourg February 27, 2015

    Strategic Europe continues its series devoted to explaining the foreign and security policy ambitions of the 28 EU member states. We have asked our contributors from each capital to give a candid assessment of their country’s perception of security and strategy, with a ranking on a scale from 0 (the laggards) to 5 (the ambitious). This week, the spotlight is on France.

    *

    France’s foreign policy ambitions are high, scoring an assertive 5 out of 5. This is a product of history, from the victorious end of the Hundred Years’ War in the mid-fifteenth century to modern times; of cultural attitudes (the word “modesty,” in its English meaning, does not exist in French); and of geography, which makes France both a continental and a maritime power, a country of the North and of the South.

    Although France’s economic standing has been decreasing in recent years, that has not affected the country’s foreign policy ambitions, which remain consistently high. The powers of the French president under the Fifth Republic, like those of his U.S. counterpart, guarantee that every head of state is, or quickly becomes, a foreign policy leader. That ensures that foreign affairs always have first-rank status.

    France’s economic ranking has been shrinking, and with it, the budgetary means to sustain the tools of foreign power and influence. But this has not led to a downscaling of ambitions in recent years. Other European countries are not performing better in the longer run. It may come as a surprise to some that France’s growth rate since the introduction of the euro in 1999 has exceeded that of Germany and of the eurozone as a whole.

    As for emerging powers, only China has the wherewithal to outrank France in external policy clout, while India still possesses a foreign service about the size of Belgium’s. Russia is less powerful than the former Soviet Union, and Brazil, a close partner of France, is hampered by a European rate of growth. Meanwhile, Japan is transfixed by its geopolitical situation between rising China and its U.S. guarantor.

    Although France’s economic standing has been decreasing in recent years, that has not affected the country’s foreign policy ambitions, which remain consistently high. In such a context, France will want to continue maximizing the diplomatic leverage provided by the projection of military force and by the country’s status as both a nuclear power and a permanent member of the UN Security Council. Paris will also continue to benefit from the soft power of the Francophone world and from France’s strong positions in the sale of so-called goods of sovereignty in the fields of aerospace, defense, energy, and transportation infrastructure.

    France can justify the maintenance of a high-profile external policy by the fact that it carries benefits whether or not the EU develops an active, broad-spectrum foreign and security policy. If the EU builds up a collective ability to act on the global stage, France will have every reason to do what it takes to be at the heart of the upstream production of European foreign policy, along with Britain and Germany. If the EU remains a surrogate and disjointed external actor, France will have no particular reason to change its current ambitions.

    Each French president is, or quickly becomes, a foreign policy leader.
     
    Tweet This

    However, an ambitious external policy as France’s default option may be challenged or even derailed under certain circumstances.

    An unlikely, but no longer unthinkable, accession to power of the National Front would massively isolate France from its natural partners of the West, inside and outside the EU framework. As was obvious in the aftermath of the January 2015 terrorist attacks, the National Front remains an unreconstructed extreme-right party and will presumably remain so when the 2017 presidential and legislative elections take place.

    A very different challenge could occur if Britain were to leave the EU as the result of an in-out referendum, which British Prime Minister David Cameron has promised to hold by 2017. In this case, France’s foreign policy profile could appear as an anomaly in an EU whose overall strategic and diplomatic culture would be closer to the herbivorous instincts of a geopolitically (and not only economically) dominant Germany than to those of an assertive but peripheral France.

    This would in turn give Paris an incentive to block further development of an EU external policy. France could also be tempted to co-opt like-minded states to balance Germany, in a soft but uninspiring reminder of policies that properly belong to another age.

    Herein lies a paradox. In the diplomatic and military spheres, Paris and London have every incentive to mutually support each other in their endeavor to punch above their weight, to paraphrase former British foreign secretary Douglas Hurd. Indeed, this generally is the case, as in the 2010 Lancaster House Treaties, which notably reinforce both countries’ long-term status as nuclear powers, or in the pair’s day-to-day cooperation in the UN Security Council.

    Neither #France nor Britain is doing much to avoid a #Brexit.
     
    Tweet This

    Yet the political leadership of neither country is doing much to diminish the risks of a British exit from the EU, whether in the expression of national positions on the future of the EU or in discussions on the issue within the EU institutions. The UK takes little heed of French sensitivities concerning the future of the EU; and France responds in kind in a manner that can suggest that Britain’s exit would cause Paris to shed no tears. This set of attitudes is a self-defeating anomaly that should be addressed after the UK’s May 2015 general election.

    Despite these potential challenges to its foreign policy stature, Paris remains an ambitious actor on the global stage. Thanks to the considerable benefits that such a role brings, France is likely to maintain its significant level of external engagement for the foreseeable future.

     

    François Heisbourg is a special adviser at the Foundation for Strategic Research.

     

     
     
     
  • Tales of Transformation From Hungary, Romania, and Moldova

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Thursday, February 26, 2015 3

    EU support and membership can help post-Communist countries become modern democracies, but it is citizens who have the power to complete—or reverse—those transformations.

     
     
  • Judy Asks: Is NATO’s 2 Percent Spending Call Realistic?

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Wednesday, February 25, 2015 3

    Every week, a selection of leading experts answer a new question from Judy Dempsey on the foreign and security policy challenges shaping Europe’s role in the world.

     
     
  • Why Ukraine Was No Game Changer—So Far

    Posted by: Jan Techau Tuesday, February 24, 2015 8

    Far from altering Europe’s geopolitical landscape, the Ukraine crisis has only reconfirmed the continent’s old order.

     
     
  • Not Another Iron Curtain

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Monday, February 23, 2015 9

    The EU urgently needs to tie Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe as close as possible to the bloc and prevent the continent from becoming divided again.

     
     
  • Letter From Valletta

    Posted by: Anthony Manduca Friday, February 20, 2015

    Malta’s small size prevents it from coming up with major foreign policy initiatives, but it is nevertheless keen to promote peace and stability in the Mediterranean.

     
     
  • Europe and the End of Ukraine’s Territorial Integrity

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Thursday, February 19, 2015 24

    Despite much rhetoric to the contrary, EU leaders have torn up the post–Cold War rules of territorial integrity by failing to defend Ukraine’s borders.

     
     
  • Judy Asks: Is Britain Still a Foreign Policy Power?

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Wednesday, February 18, 2015 4

    Every week, a selection of leading experts answer a new question from Judy Dempsey on the foreign and security policy challenges shaping Europe’s role in the world.

     
     
  • Exit America, Europe’s Trust Engine?

    Posted by: Jan Techau Tuesday, February 17, 2015 4

    The United States succeeded as Europe’s benevolent hegemon because it was able to pacify rivaling European states and instill mutual trust in them. That role is still needed.

     
     
  • Euro-Atlanticism After Minsk II

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Monday, February 16, 2015

    As Moldova, Macedonia, and Montenegro are knocking on the doors of EU and NATO, the West cannot take these countries’ European orientation for granted.

     
     
  • Letter From Copenhagen

    Posted by: Bo Lidegaard Friday, February 13, 2015 3

    Denmark pursues an active foreign policy at both the European and the international level, helping develop joint EU approaches and contributing to military interventions.

     
     
  • Merkel Alone

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Thursday, February 12, 2015 9

    The German chancellor has done everything possible, excluding using force, to end the war in eastern Ukraine. Now, she needs wide support to make a new peace accord stick.

     
     
  • Judy Asks: Is Germany Discovering Strategy?

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Wednesday, February 11, 2015 2

    A selection of leading experts answer a new question from Judy Dempsey on the foreign and security policy challenges shaping Europe’s role in the world.

     
     
  • European Security After Ukraine

    Posted by: Jan Techau Tuesday, February 10, 2015 13

    The war in eastern Ukraine is about more than the future of the European geopolitical order. It is about the role of the United States in Europe.

     
     
  • What Russia and the Islamic State Mean for U.S.-European Ties

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Monday, February 09, 2015 3

    From Russian intimidation to Middle Eastern jihadism, the threats facing the West should galvanize, not weaken, the transatlantic relationship.

     
     
  • Judy Asks: Can the West Save Ukraine?

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Sunday, February 08, 2015 2

    A selection of leading experts answer a new question from Judy Dempsey on the foreign and security policy challenges shaping Europe’s role in the world.

     
     
  • The Tragedy of Petro Poroshenko

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Sunday, February 08, 2015 6

    Damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t, Ukraine’s president may have to cede more territory to end the conflict raging in the country’s east.

     
     
  • The Dialogue of the Deaf Between the West and Russia

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Saturday, February 07, 2015 1

    The gap between the Kremlin and the transatlantic allies was exposed to the full at the Munich Security Conference—and shows no signs of narrowing.

     
     
  • Merkel in Munich

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Saturday, February 07, 2015 9

    The German chancellor has made clear that Berlin will neither provide weapons to Ukraine nor give up its diplomatic attempts to end the conflict in the country’s east.

     
     
  • Europe’s Losing Information War

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Friday, February 06, 2015 5

    European governments and the EU are doing little or nothing to counter Russian propaganda.

     
     

About Strategic Europe

Judy Dempsey’s Strategic Europe offers insightful analysis, fresh commentary, and concrete policy recommendations from some of Europe’s keenest international affairs observers.

Subscribe Today

Sign up to receive Judy Dempsey's Strategic Europe updates in your inbox! Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

Sign up to receive Strategic Europe updates in your inbox!
 
Carnegie Europe
 
Carnegie Europe Rue du Congrès, 15 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 2 735 56 50 Fax: +32 2736 6222
Please note...

You are leaving the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy's website and entering another Carnegie global site.

请注意...

您离开卡内基 - 清华全球政策中心网站,进入另一个卡内基全球网站。