• Georgia Holds an Election Without Saviors

    Posted by: Thomas de Waal September 26, 2016

    Georgia is embarking on a parliamentary election that is unusual by the standards of the surrounding post-Soviet region for being so normal.

    There is a favorite to win the election on October 8—the current governing Georgian Dream party—but victory is not guaranteed. The vote is expected to be free and fair, despite the problem that outside the capital, the ruling party is unduly powerful and will easily win many seats in the contests for the country’s single-member constituencies. All the same, other parties can also expect strong representation in the parliament and may stop Georgian Dream from achieving an outright majority.

    This is a stark contrast to Russia, where President Vladimir Putin’s United Russia party was awarded another crushing victory in the September 18 parliamentary election, or Azerbaijan, which holds a referendum on September 26 on constitutional changes that can prolong the rule of President Ilham Aliyev almost indefinitely.

    That contrast by itself makes the holding of an election by normal democratic rules something that Western countries, and the EU in particular, should not just welcome but celebrate—and follow up with more support for Georgia.

    This will also be the first election in Georgian history in which no big charismatic figure is dominating the headlines. Neither of Georgia’s two titans, ex-president Mikheil Saakashvili and former prime minister Bidzina Ivanishvili, is on the ballot, even if they still lurk behind the scenes and give television interviews. For the first time since Georgia’s first free election of the modern era in 1990, there is no savior in sight, just a selection of ordinary politicians.

    At the head of Georgian Dream’s party list is the current prime minister, Giorgi Kvirikashvili, a man credited with having lowered the political temperature in Georgia and with being a good manager. He is the clear favorite to keep his job after the election—and should he do so, he will be able to move out of the shadow of Ivanishvili.

    The pragmatic Davit Bakradze heads the list of Saakashvili’s United National Movement, which has rebranded itself to detach itself somewhat from the bad associations of the last years of the former president. In second position on the list is Saakashvili’s Dutch-born wife Sandra Roelofs, whose cool temperament is a big contrast to that of her husband.

    If, as expected, these two parties are the largest in the parliament, each will be represented by a professional slate of deputies that includes plenty of women.

    But in the Georgian case, normality also means a fairly high level of apathy and cynicism. The most striking finding in an opinion poll commissioned by the U.S. National Democratic Institute and conducted over summer 2016 was that 67 percent of Georgians said they were likely to vote, but 57 percent were still undecided as to whom to choose. Moreover, the poll recorded that support for democracy as a system of government had declined from 68 percent in 2012 to 47 percent in 2015.

    The poll was conducted by the Caucasus Research Resource Centers, a sociological organization. Speaking to me from Tbilisi, Koba Turmanidze, its Georgia director, agreed that the findings were worrying but said they could be interpreted as a sign that Georgian voters were more mature and savvy than before about their politicians.

    Turmanidze reminded me that Georgian politicians habitually promise voters everything under the sun. For example, Saakashvili told voters in the campaign for the 2008 presidential election that the breakaway region of South Ossetia was “a loose tooth ready for removal” and that it would take him a few months to return it to Georgia. In 2012, Ivanishvili promised massive increases in the state pension if elected.

    “Expectations have always been higher than what parties deliver, so it is logical that there is a large number of undecided voters,” Turmanidze said.

    Georgian politics is still prone to scandal, denunciation, and populist drama, all of which could influence the large army of undecideds. Last-minute voters could opt for the populist pro-Russian Alliance of Patriots of Georgia party, which might be able to win bargaining power in a parliament in which no party has a clear majority. Yet even this bad scenario would not be enough to constitute a tilt back toward Russia. The Russian brand is so toxic in Georgia that even the Alliance of Patriots presents a website in Georgian and English but not Russian.

    Or the late deciders could choose the State for a People bloc, headed by the nearest thing this election has to a charismatic personality, opera singer Paata Burchuladze. Burchuladze is heading a loose coalition of parties and looks likely to clear the barrier of winning 5 percent of the vote and enter the parliament, thanks to his name recognition and generous funding from some Georgian businessmen. His ideological stance is rather unclear, and the party may just be a vehicle for his personal ambitions. But many of Burchuladze’s allies are disaffected former Saakashvili supporters, and his main contribution to the election may be to split the pro-Western vote and hurt the chances of two more reputable parties, Irakli Alasania’s Free Democrats and the highly professional but not very popular Republican Party of Georgia.

    All of which is to say that the outcome of Georgia’s parliamentary election may be a bit of a muddle—but a democratic muddle, nonetheless. If there is no clear result, it will be a test for Georgia’s other institutions—its president, civil servants, media, and courts—to keep the ship of state moving forward. Thanks to continuing state building in Georgia, there is every reason to believe that they can cope.

    The outcome will also be a test for Georgia’s Western friends, who often also promise more than they deliver. Here, the European Union has done itself no favors. It promised Georgians visa liberalization after Georgia met all the criteria the EU had set—but it now looks unlikely that the European Parliament will manage to approve the deal before the election in October. Observers can only hope for a better EU performance when a new Georgian government is formed.


  • Book Review: Connectography by Parag Khanna

    Posted by: John Kornblum Friday, September 23, 2016

    If leaders and the general public understood the meaning of the new world being built around them, they would not find globalization so frightening.

  • The Ebbing of Democracy in the Western Balkans

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Thursday, September 22, 2016

    Only a major shift by the EU and international donors will salvage the Western Balkans from rampant corruption, growing authoritarianism, and instability.

  • Judy Asks: Does the UN Matter?

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Wednesday, September 21, 2016

    A selection of experts answer a new question from Judy Dempsey on the foreign and security policy challenges shaping Europe’s role in the world.

  • Merkel After Berlin’s Regional Election

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Tuesday, September 20, 2016

    The outcome of the German capital’s election doesn’t mean the end of the Merkel era. What the result shows is the miserable quality of the established political parties.

  • The EU and Turkey’s Concrete Work Agenda

    Posted by: Marc Pierini Monday, September 19, 2016

    Brussels and Ankara have a long to-do list ahead of them. But domestic politics on both sides could interfere with this schedule.

  • Europe’s New Narrative in Bratislava

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Friday, September 16, 2016

    After Britain’s vote to leave the bloc, the European Union is changing its narrative to emphasize migration, terrorism, and globalization.

  • EU Defense, Where Political Opportunity Meets Strategic Necessity

    Posted by: Daniel Keohane Thursday, September 15, 2016

    The post-Brexit cacophony may generate enough political momentum to keep defense high on the EU agenda. But an EU army won’t appear anytime soon.

  • Judy Asks: Can Ukraine Turn the Corner?

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Wednesday, September 14, 2016

    A selection of experts answer a new question from Judy Dempsey on the foreign and security policy challenges shaping Europe’s role in the world.

  • Why Croatia Matters to the Western Balkans

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Tuesday, September 13, 2016 3

    Dogged by corruption and an unattractive business environment, Croatia is no shining example for its Western Balkan neighbors wanting to join the EU.

  • Brexit and the Rise of Rejectionism

    Posted by: Peter Kellner Monday, September 12, 2016 2

    Tighter immigration controls will do little or nothing to tackle the West’s underlying problems or help marginalize rejectionist politics.

  • Belarus’s Election Tests the EU’s Global Strategy

    Posted by: Yauheni Preiherman, Richard Youngs Friday, September 09, 2016

    Dialogue between Brussels and Minsk has intensified, but the ongoing rapprochement does not represent a sufficiently strategic or comprehensive policy.

  • The Line in the Sand: Finland and the Unpredictable Neighbor

    Posted by: René Nyberg Thursday, September 08, 2016 2 Русский

    Keeping open the option of NATO membership is key for Finland. But it is also a line in the sand for Russia.

  • Judy Asks: Can the EU Survive Without Britain?

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Wednesday, September 07, 2016

    A selection of experts answer a new question from Judy Dempsey on the foreign and security policy challenges shaping Europe’s role in the world.

  • The Insincere Calls for a European Army

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Tuesday, September 06, 2016 6

    The idea that the EU should have its own army lacks all credibility—and besides, it is no panacea to Europe’s glaring security and intelligence deficits.

  • The Changing Face of German Conservatism

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Monday, September 05, 2016 1

    A far-right, anti-immigrant party is eroding support for Germany’s conservatives, with consequences for their leader, Chancellor Angela Merkel.

  • What European Resilience Should Really Mean

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Friday, September 02, 2016

    If the concept of resilience is to have any relevance, it should first and foremost mean energy security. But some EU countries’ policies are undermining that resilience.

  • A Flexible Europe After the Brexit Vote

    Posted by: Cornelius Adebahr Thursday, September 01, 2016 2

    It’s time for a pan-European union that encompasses all of the continent’s sovereign countries at different levels of integration.

  • Judy Asks: Is the Burka Compatible With Integration?

    Posted by: Judy Dempsey Wednesday, August 31, 2016

    A selection of experts answer a new question from Judy Dempsey on the foreign and security policy challenges shaping Europe’s role in the world.

  • Russia, Turkey, and a Multipolar World

    Posted by: Thomas de Waal Tuesday, August 30, 2016 3

    The Russian and Turkish presidents are more comfortable with a world in which alliances are transient and traditional great powers set the agenda.


About Strategic Europe

Judy Dempsey’s Strategic Europe offers insightful analysis, fresh commentary, and concrete policy recommendations from some of Europe’s keenest international affairs observers.

Subscribe Today

Sign up to receive Judy Dempsey's Strategic Europe updates in your inbox! Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

Sign up to receive Strategic Europe updates in your inbox!
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe Rue du Congrès, 15 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 2 735 56 50 Fax: +32 2736 6222
Please note...

You are leaving the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy's website and entering another Carnegie global site.


您离开卡内基 - 清华全球政策中心网站,进入另一个卡内基全球网站。