True Atlanticism Just Got a Little Harder

Ashton; Kerry
Posted by: 5 Print Page

The members of my tribe—Europe’s ever-shrinking band of true transatlanticists—are looking a bit silly these days.

These are the people that truly believe that America and Europe need each other, can’t do without each other for long, and must move even closer together if the West is to survive as a meaningful political model. They believe this not out of a sense of nostalgia, but because of sober geopolitical assessments. And those strategic calculations are relevant now more than ever.

Often, these tribespeople criticize the Europeans for not being active enough in international affairs, for underinvesting in NATO, and for being generally complacent and dreamy-eyed about military matters.

Transatlanticists don’t make these points to please the Americans, but to remind the Europeans of the need to protect their own interests. That means being strong, capable, and determined enough in global affairs to be taken seriously by the Americans when they make decisions of global reach.

When the National Security Agency (NSA) spy scandal broke, my fellow tribespeople and I found ourselves in a rather uncomfortable position. We were all savvy enough to know that the snooping was going on. But when we remarked that the scale of the eavesdropping was perhaps going a bit too far and was violating the spirit of a trustworthy relationship, we got caught in the crossfire.

From the eastern side of the Atlantic, we were told: “See, this is where your slavishly pro-American position has gotten you. This is what you get when you become their poodle.” Almost within hours, it became a lot harder to make the transatlantic case in Europe. Some exasperated colleagues were complaining that years of work had been flushed down the toilet in days.

From the other side of the pond, our complaint provoked a different reaction. I was called a “petulant baby” by a particularly robust tweep from New York, who then continued: “You didn’t think you needed the US, you made pipeline deals with Russia, you hate on Israel. Consequences.” In other words: if you decide to act like the enemy, don’t be surprised when you’re treated like the enemy.

This crisis is bringing out people’s worst instincts. Populists on the right and the left, as always, seek to cash in by singing their nationalist, anti-American songs, or by promoting the old canard of an independent, isolationist European Sonderweg.

But now, even reasonable, mainstream politicians are being driven toward silliness because they smell an opportunity to score some cheap popularity points with their voters. Just look at the grandstanding coming out of the European Parliament and the European Commission. The fallout from the NSA revelations is a gift from heaven for all enemies of the transatlantic relationship, whether they are based in the United States, the EU, Russia, or elsewhere.

Between these affronts, the brave but decimated clan of true transatlanticists risks being plowed under. Some of them have decided to keep a low profile for the time being, saving their energy for when the hysteria has ebbed away. Then, the work to rebuild transatlantic ties will require the stamina of well-rested tribesmen.

But keeping a low profile is a bad idea in a situation like this. It needs to be better understood in Europe that surveillance and prying of this kind are nothing new, and that while the sheer size of the operation may be mind-boggling, it does not warrant widespread hysteria. European authorities regularly benefit from information scooped up and forwarded by U.S. intelligence services. Europeans themselves are hardly angels when it comes to collecting data and spying on friend and foe alike.

And yet, the European outrage is justified. America needs to understand that limitless spying will destroy trust and create suspicion and resentment. The U.S. government needs to reacquaint itself with a proper sense of proportion and boundaries in terms of what can be done to allies and partners.

But there is an even more important lesson from this affair. No matter how much we all like the poetry of the shared transatlantic values of freedom, dignity, human rights, and the rule of law, what matters in international relations are national interests and the power to pursue them.

No sweet-talking by President Obama in front of Berlin’s Brandenburg Gate can cloak the fact that foreign policy is a competitive game played with all available tools, even among friends. At the core of the problem lies the fact that Europeans often don’t want to compete in the ugly power game of international politics.

For Europeans, the spy scandal is a much-needed reminder that if they want to be respected, influential, and relevant, they will have to start thinking strategically and invest their taxpayers’ money wisely—and play hardball.

Europe needs America if it wants to stay safe, free, and prosperous. It is crucial for Europeans to understand that their increased engagement will make them both less dependent and more interesting as a partner for the United States.

You don’t have to be a transatlanticist tribesman to understand this, just a realist. But realists are an even more endangered species these days.



Comments (5)

  • Christian Schulz
    Well, well ... If I may play the advocatus diaboli in this circle and ask a heretic question: How does this "tribe" feel about stopping its rhetoric navel gazing (by reciting the same old, same old phrases again and again and again), stopping its condescending tone towards the people of Europe and starting to think about ways to:

    a) engage the populations in a meaningful discussion (which, ultimately, need to be convinced of any concept - not just the political representatives who will do what's best for their chances of being elected, anyway)
    b) develop not just demands and endless conference monologues about Europe's (and essentially Germany's) lack of strategic thinking (or should I translate this as lack of suitably transatlanticist outlook?) but viable arguments to support your theses, believable scenarios and explanations on what consequences which decision may have under what circumstances.

    I've read a lot of documents from various think tanks, from Judy Dempsey, you Mr. Techau, Ulrich Speck and others, and one striking characteristic of all of them was a complete lack of arguments in favor of your theses! When the populations (and politicians - in a democracy the political class cannot be divorced from the parent society) do not think the way you think they should then it's not just a question of laziness, ineptitude or indifference (not to say those aren't present, though) but mostly because they aren't convinced of it! I know for sure that I do not know why I should sanction german-supported military missions in North Africa or the Middle East, why Germany should play what left-leaning folks would inescapably term "bully boy" in that area and I am not one of those germans who reflexively flinch when the term "Military" is used. Just because it may seem obvious and unavoidable to you it's not a given that this is so for the ordinary citizens who live in a very different "reality".

    In the FAZ Forum on Security Policy you, Mr, Techau, spoke of the two very different realities of Germany and the international expectations WRT defense and security policies (I watched the videos on Youtube). Maybe it's time for the "strategic community" to stop being the proverbial stay-at-home's and develop arguments, scenarios and explanations for the population - and engage them in a meaningful discussion to bring these different realities in line instead of rehashing the same old theses over and over again.
    Reply to this post

    Close Panel
  • Eberhard Rhein, Brussels
    Well said, we have, of course, get over our initial dismay at the "revelations". Spying EU offices in Washington and elsewhere may be shocking but not teaching the US Administration much new they did not know.
    After the summer, we shall have to sit down on how to frame the comprehensive trade,investment and regulatory relationship.
    Reply to this post

    Close Panel
  • MC
    "Europe needs America if it wants to stay safe, free, and prosperous. It is crucial for Europeans to understand that their increased engagement will make them both less dependent and more interesting as a partner for the United States.

    You don’t have to be a transatlanticist tribesman to understand this, just a realist. But realists are an even more endangered species these days."

    Who needs the US umbrella? Germany, it spares so many expenses !

    « La France ne le sait pas, mais nous sommes en guerre avec l’Amérique. Oui, une guerre permanente, une guerre vitale, une guerre économique, une guerre sans mort apparemment. Oui, ils sont très durs les Américains, ils sont voraces, ils veulent un pouvoir sans partage sur le monde. C’est une guerre inconnue, une guerre permanente, sans mort apparemment et pourtant une guerre à mort. »

    Mitterrand (and though he participated into the Desert Storm operation, he gave the "Farewell" net to Reagan...)

    Reply to this post

    Close Panel
  • KK
    "Ugly power game of international politics", "playing hard ball" is all very well but why does the USA pontificate about being the "leader of the free world", "torchbearer of democracy" etc. Those are noble sentiments and are far removed from ugly power games and hard ball play. If the USA can desist from such pontification (which is just another word for lying), they may regain some of the respect they have lost from all this lying, spying and hard ball playing. Then again, who cares about respect when you have limitless power!
    Reply to this post

    Close Panel
    • tariq replies...
      Well, the author is right in maintaining that both Europe and America need each other. And may I go one step forward: that is if the western political, social and economic model is to service - it is imperative for both USA and Europe to cooperate in times to come. It is indubious that both form somewhat a monolithic civilization, thus the weakening of one would mean the weakening of the other.

Subscribe Today

Sign up to receive Judy Dempsey's Strategic Europe updates in your inbox! Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

Sign up to receive Strategic Europe updates in your inbox!
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe Rue du Congrès, 15 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 2 735 56 50 Fax: +32 2736 6222
Please note...

You are leaving the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy's website and entering another Carnegie global site.


您离开卡内基 - 清华全球政策中心网站,进入另一个卡内基全球网站。