The coronavirus (COVID-19) is a pandemic that is chiseling away at an order that the democratic West had taken for granted since the end of World War Two. That order was based on predictability, on motivation, on ambition and on competence. That order was also based on the market economy anchored on the pursuit of growth and prosperity with a corresponding infrastructure to underpin it.
The 2008-2009 global financial crisis, followed by the near-collapse of the Euro currency punctured the West's self-confidence. The West recovered. But it didn't fundamentally alter how democracies reacted to crises. It was a return to business as usual. Reaction prevailed over preemption and resilience.
And even when the war in Syria happened a decade ago, leading to hundreds of thousands of deaths and millions of refugees – with over one million people arriving in Germany because of Chancellor Angela Merkel's generous open-door policy – democracies, with few exceptions, used the refugee crisis to bunker down. Some borders inside the European Union were closed. European Union leaders still haggle over agreeing a common refugee, migration and asylum policy.
Populist parties and movements have exploited these crises. They used them to promote agendas based on protecting national sovereignty and criticizing globalization. They also used the (borderless) social media to reach wider audiences. The liberal script came under immense pressure.
COVID-19 will test it further.
Because it is a virus that knows no borders, it has punctured Europe's comfort zone. European governments are closing their borders and restricting incoming and outward travel, in addition to citizens being ordered to stay in-doors and all-non-essential enterprises and shops to be closed. Public entertainment and sports events have been banned. The pandemic has also exposed the shortfalls in health systems across most EU countries. They are struggling to manufacture ventilators and supply essential protection clothing for the medical staff.
That is the micro picture.
As for the bigger picture, even though it is very early days to have any certainty about how and when the virus will retreat, a few trends are trickling through the fog of fear and uncertainty about how they will affect the liberal script.
The first is the demand for truth, transparency and clarity. The Chinese and American leaderships are in an unseemly blame game about the virus's origins at a time when the West needs leadership and a strong multilateral response. China has clamped down on any criticism. President Donald Trump has vacillated between self-denial and inconsistency. And Russia is spreading disinformation about the virus.
Then there is Germany's stance. Yes, the government reacted slowly to the virus and only really began taking it seriously when it started to ravage Italy in early March. But since then, as Chancellor at the helm since 2005 and recently considered a lame duck by some after her decision last year not to run again for the country's top job in 2021, Merkel has excelled in reaching out to Germans.
This was never her style. But her nation-wide address on March 18 and her statements defending truth, solidarity, decency combined with the need for very tough restrictions have shown Merkel display a leadership sorely needed across Europe - and on the other side of the Atlantic. As a result of her handling of the crisis, her ratings have shot up. Her conservative bloc is running high in the polls because she is combining truth and facts with calls for patience and support from the population. It is a winning ticket, so far.
In contrast, support for the anti-migration, anti-Islam and Euro-sceptic Alternative for Germany is falling. And so is support for the Green party whose rise in the polls seemed unstoppable until the virus took hold in Germany. For the moment, the polarizing squabbling that characterized German politics over the past few years has abated. Merkel, as well as Olaf Scholz, her finance minister, and Jens Spahn, her health minister, are trusted.
Second, as a corollary to this trend in Germany, in other European countries, citizens are turning to their leaders for reassurance. Populist leaders which are adept at manipulating a crisis, especially since they don't have to take responsibility since they are not in power, are fumbling over how to exploit this mortal crisis.
Not Viktor Orban. Using the coronavirus as an excuse, the Hungarian prime minister has called a state of emergency and the parliament, completely dominated by Orban's Fidesz party, passed a bill on March 30 allowing him to rule by decree. Democracy has all but been suspended in a country that is a member of the EU and NATO. If Orban can exploit the pandemic for his own political goals there's no reason why other leaders won't try the same. Much will depend on how the EU and Merkel react to this blatant challenge of democratic norms.
The third aspect to this crisis is how the state, information technology and artificial intelligence will challenge the liberal script.
Whether in democratic or authoritarian countries, COVID-19 has put the state in the driving seat. Leaders have accumulated considerable powers across the board. Increasingly, with China and South Korea leading the way, in order to contain the virus, the authorities are developing systems to track individuals via various apps.
The clock can't turn back these technological changes. We saw how surveillance and intrusiveness increased after 9/11 in the United States and in EU countries as well. Governments can always justify these strict(er) measures for security reasons.
But if democratic governments want to retain trust, they need to be as transparent and accountable as possible about how they use the network of sensors that can, as the Economist wrote on March 28, "co-ordinate the responses of both individuals and whole populations to a degree unimaginable in any previous pandemic."
But it's also about governments being competent and confident. That means including citizens and civil society to ensure that the liberal script can adapt and can prosper. Locking down the liberal script would have terrible consequences for accountability, for stability and for the West.
Comments(1)
“Zhit' stálo lúchshe, Stakhanovites”, Stalin’s 1935 assessment, was basically similar, other time, other script, same level of reality disconnect. It isn’t clear why the author considers WWII has ended, as the war started in 1914 is split into one, two, three (long overdue, strategic nuclear) and four (the one the eternal optimist Einstein thought there will be people left to fight, and sticks to use). With all the predictability, motivation, ambition and competence people are accused of listening to sirens calls from Russia, disinformation succeeding better than propaganda in Hoover and McCarthy’s time. That was communist propaganda, and didn’t succeed; all Comecon couldn’t produce a nice pair of blue jeans, and that ended it. Talking about disinformation, nobody explained Kissinger that China is an actual communist country, his humiliating (for the West) 1971 trip to China, as a supplicant; his lack of deep time (at human scale) geopolitical knowledge (who wouldn’t listen to Napoleon), led us to today. With all the above and whatever MPS (and Rand) bestowed on us as blueprint, i.e. nothing exists outside primeval market instincts and me, when it is about PPE, and drugs, they still have to be imported from China and India. To make it worse, it appears that a vaccine for COVID-19 can be found and produced. Although we all hope for it, that will prove that the West still had the knowledge to prepare for a SARS like coronavirus, but simply couldn’t find a way to tax the wealthiest (400 wealthiest in the US, same wealth as bottom 64%), and use that for “the corresponding infrastructure to underpin it”. That would have been preparing for what we knew was coming, a molecular machine sharing life’s fundamental principle, live, which sometimes kills your host. This wealth distribution has sapped the foundation of the script, the middle class, and social mobility. It has sapped the will of the West to bear children, even when the probability to sacrifice them in world wars, the Western tradition, was for a while remote. The 90’s should have been an adrenaline shot for Europe, from the Urals, a huge number of people with ambition to move upwards, a mini globalization. It didn’t work, the first casualty being Britannia, now unchained, trying to imitate on Thames its former colony (1819 – 1959), Singapore. Unfortunately, Johnson confuses Pisa scores with deregulation, and herd immunity (unleashed upon some of his electorate) with testing. Still, I hope the author is right.
Comment Policy
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.