UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson calls them the “awesome foursome.”
These days, two of the four nations that make up the United Kingdom are less keen on Britain’s prime minister than he is on them. The result could be a big threat to one of his objectives for Brexit: stronger internal relations within the UK.
Historically, the UK has never been a fixed entity. Relations between England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales have fluctuated. Less than one hundred years ago, the UK comprised all of the British isles, before a bitter civil war led to the secession of twenty-six of Ireland’s thirty-two counties in 1922.
Tensions have never disappeared. For three decades between the late 1960s and the late 1990s, Northern Ireland—and occasionally English cities—suffered from the Troubles, the Irish Republican Army’s (IRA’s) violent campaign to reunite Ireland by force. The IRA killed more than 2,000 people, their “loyalist,” pro-UK opponents more than 1,000, and the British army more than 300.
In Scotland and Wales, nationalist parties have made their mark more peacefully. Both countries now have their own national parliaments with substantial powers, but while the appetite for full independence is limited in Wales, it has grown in Scotland.
Brexit has now added a new dimension to these historical tensions. It may well contribute over time to the breaking up of the United Kingdom; only a brave gambler would bet on both Scotland and Northern Ireland still belonging to the UK in 2040.
Let us take the two in turn.
When Scotland’s new parliament first met in 1999, one of its members was applauded for declaring: “The Scottish Parliament, adjourned on March 25 in the year 1707, is hereby reconvened.”
That statement is long on nationalist nostalgia but short on accuracy. Scotland’s currency, and hence its overall economic powers, is controlled by London—as are its defense and foreign policy.
When the UK voted for Brexit in 2016, Scots divided by almost two to one in favor of staying in the EU. But Scotland was bound by the UK-wide result: it was forced to leave the EU along with England, Northern Ireland, and Wales.
This reopened a debate that seemed to have been settled in 2014, when a Scottish independence referendum resulted in Scots voting by 55 to 45 percent to remain in the UK. It was supposed to be a once-in-a-generation decision that offered Scots continuing membership of both the UK and the EU.
Many Scots now feel that their only way to rejoin the EU is to break away from the UK. More than ever before, the nationalist and European causes in Scotland have come together—and have been gaining support.
For the first time, polls conducted in 2020 report that a majority of Scots now favor independence from the UK. The rise in support is a direct response to Scotland being forced against its will to leave the EU.
In 2021, Scotland will elect a new parliament. The Scottish National Party (SNP) is set for its best-ever result and will remain in power in Edinburgh. Together with the Greens, also pro-independence and pro-EU, the SNP will be sure of a majority—and possibly a large majority—for a fresh referendum on independence.
Legally, however, Scotland’s politicians do not have the power to call a referendum. They can ask for one, but the decision rests with Westminster. Here, the Conservatives enjoy a large majority, and they oppose a fresh referendum. Johnson, the Conservative Party leader, says the Scots should wait forty years before another independence vote.
In the short run, London’s veto will prevail. The long run is another matter. If the Conservatives remain in power in Westminster, and the SNP in Edinburgh, the stage will be set for a constitutional crisis. Reluctantly, the Conservatives may have to give way.
Alternatively, the Conservatives may be voted out of office at the next UK general election. However, the main opposition party, Labour, will find it extremely hard to win outright. A far more likely outcome, if the Conservatives do lose, is a minority Labour government dependent on SNP support. And the price of that support will be agreement on a new vote on Scottish independence.
One way or another, a referendum is likely before 2030. Scotland’s departure from the UK is a distinct possibility.
Northern Ireland’s politics are very different; but its destination may be the same as Scotland’s. Its political tribes are driven by religion: the Protestant majority is overwhelmingly pro-British, while the Catholic minority wants a reunited Ireland. For the time being, therefore, most of Northern Ireland’s voters want to stay within the UK.
But three factors are changing that simple political arithmetic.
First, demographics—driven by birth rates and migration—are edging Northern Ireland slowly but remorselessly toward a Catholic majority.
Second, a small but growing minority of voters reject the sectarian divide and no longer vote according to their religion.
Third—and this is the one respect in which Northern Ireland resembles Scotland—Brexit is making a difference. Under the new UK-EU agreement on future relations, concluded on December 24, 2020, the island of Ireland remains politically divided but is economically more united than at any time since 1922.
There are no border posts, rules, or tariffs to impede trade across the 500-kilometer border between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic; but trade between Northern Ireland and mainland Britain is now subject to significant checks, resulting in empty shelves in Northern Irish supermarkets.
The demographic and economic logic of Northern Ireland points to Irish reunification in the next 10–20 years.
Already, polls indicate a shift in views toward a 50-50 division on whether to leave the UK. Meanwhile, the prospect of rejoining the EU—which 56 percent of Northern Irish voters in 2016 did not want to leave—is attractive, not just to Catholic nationalists, but also to the growing minority of anti-sectarian Protestants.
Only in Wales do nationalists remain in a clear minority.
By 2040, Johnson’s “awesome foursome” may be a thing of the past. Brexit could end up dividing the United Kingdom more comprehensively than it divides Europe.
Comments(5)
you don't mention covid, but the fact that health is a devolved responsibility has given scottish and welsh leaders in particular a forum and an authority they did not have before - even though their actual handling of the pandemic has not had significantly better results than in england - and enhanced the idea that they could be separate countries.
A new poll can take place where GB would apply to join EE once Trump's puppet goes home as well...
After Brexit, WW1, WW2, Yugoslavia, borders are fluid especially in Europe we also have Catalonia in Spain and Belgium with French and Flemish split not forgetting Bavaria in Germany also got a mention on independence there are many more in Italy, Ukraine where does this stop Peter Kellner I don't think we can just single out the UK here. Possibly this is in the spotlight because of Brexit by remainers like yourself who wish to gratify there warnings of chaos and bedlam due to the Brexit split from the EU being a lot calmer than was warned by people who voted remain. The conservatives where the party who gave the Scottish nationalists a vote in 2014 and this was settled for a generation as both sides alluded to after the no vote, Nicola Sturgeon was one the persons who said this now she says things have changed due to Brexit. Things change all the time I as a Scot voted for independence but voted for Brexit I lost one and won the other we have to respect the vote at the time and its reasoning even when it may seem stupid, good or bad. So Peter perhaps you're article on this is relevant just now or its another story to stir things up on the subject. The borders in Europe quite likely will move again by the end of this century whether its in Britain, Spain, Russia or being a little silly Malta these borders are very fluid just look at the last 100 or 500 years but then again with the EU it might become just one country and the end of 27 we have to watch that space. All this is a worry as it usually its a war that instigates all the border changes so my view is for the peace keep things as they are, as remember before the UK unification there was a war nearly every other year between England , Scotland, and sometimes over Ireland. Funny thing though my heart still rules my head and wants Scottish independence the romance of it all is in the head as they say.
Too many assumptions in this article. To get a vote and win a vote is 2 different things, present support levels to remain as it is also not always an easy task, Scotland may be allowed to join EU on a priority basis to avenge Brexit but that still will not be an easy task and that needs convincing.
It is a good article, Mr Peter Kellner, but perhaps far removed from a "reality" that is already looming by leaps and bounds: an armed confrontation of great proportions is approaching on the Eurasian continent and the United Kingdom can explain better than anyone that the best for the British it is to stay away and "free from the bureaucracy and interference from Brussels" ... The British political class has already realized, in the last 20 years, that trade relations are enough; even too much. Everything else is going to hell with Brussels' dangerous trade deals with Chinese and Russians. In London they have always warned that smoke and fantasy traders will lead to the collapse of the European Union and the euro. In short, Mr Kellner, long before there are secession problems in the UK, the European Union will be gone ... The British are adept at "sniffing out" that Washington does not pay traitors ... As is Rome . It seems that history is unforgiving. It always haunts us because nobody studies it, or learns it. The United States will take its toll, of course.
Comment Policy
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.