He didn’t waste time.
As soon as Poland joined the European Union in May 2004, then Polish president Aleksander Kwaśniewski made a passionate plea for Ukraine and Turkey. Both countries, he told me, should one day become members of the EU.
Kwaśniewski wanted his country’s southeastern neighbors to be part of a Europe whole and free—or, as he put it, “a pluralistic, open, and new Europe.”
The first phase of that open and new Europe was achieved in 1989, when the Berlin Wall was literally torn down, ending the division of Germany. The second phase took place in 2004, when eight countries that were once under the yoke of communism joined the EU, followed later by Bulgaria, Croatia, and Romania.
Since joining the EU, Poland took the lead among the countries of Central and Eastern Europe in campaigning for human rights and democracy, whether in Ukraine, in Georgia, or elsewhere in the region.
But today, Poland’s role is being superseded by the three small Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and—in particular—Lithuania. They have been vocal and active in defending the peaceful protests in neighboring Belarus, where citizens for nearly six months since August 2020 have been calling for the resignation of Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko.
The Baltic states have also unambiguously come out in support of the demonstrators in Russia, calling for the release of opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Navalny was promptly detained on January 17, 2021, when he returned to Moscow from Berlin, where he was treated for a chemical attack for which the Kremlin denies any involvement yet refuses to open a criminal investigation.
Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are doing what they can to mobilize opinion in the rest of the EU, something Poland was able to do in the past, but no longer. Since 2015, Warsaw’s reputation and credibility have been damaged because of the Polish government’s policies of undermining the independence of the judiciary and weakening the checks and balances so essential for democratic institutions.
For Linas Linkevičius, Lithuania’s former foreign and defense minister, the EU has to stand up for what it believes in. Ideally, this would mean imposing hefty sanctions on the top leaderships in Belarus and Russia and doing everything possible to defend civil society by providing legal assistance, visas, educational opportunities, and safety for those fleeing repression.
So far, the EU’s sanctions on the Belarusian leadership have been mild, to say the least. And while the EU has rolled over sanctions imposed on Russia after it illegally annexed Crimea and invaded parts of eastern Ukraine in 2014, these have had little effect on changing Russian President Vladimir Putin’s foreign policy behavior.
The Baltic states, joined by Poland, believe it is time to step up the pressure on Moscow. Germany, for one, should stop the completion of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which will bring natural gas from Russia directly to Western Europe via the Baltic Sea. Such a measure, they believe, could be a game changer.
But stopping Nord Stream 2 is not going to happen.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has no intention of changing course, even though German dependence on Russian energy will increase, and even though the Baltic states and Poland consider Nord Stream 2 a potentially powerful lever against the Kremlin.
But then, the EU isn’t particularly good at exercising solidarity with its own members. China told Sweden it would “take all necessary measures” after Stockholm decided to ban Huawei from building its 5G networks. The EU seems indifferent to this threat.
Meanwhile, other EU countries, particularly Hungary, are going their own way in relations with China—which is opening a university in Budapest—and with Russia—which is building a nuclear power plant in Hungary and supplying Budapest with its Sputnik V coronavirus vaccine.
China and Russia are big-time investors in Hungary—just as they have sizeable investments throughout the EU. So those EU governments that challenge Beijing or Moscow put themselves at risk of financial or trade retaliation.
Such is the curse of these types of investments. They bring a kind of negative foreign influence that weakens internal solidarity, as the Swedish case shows. They also expose just how committed the EU is to its own values—and to supporting those who demonstrate against corruption, injustice, arbitrary detentions, and police brutality in Belarus and Russia.
In short, it begs the question of how the EU can affect change in these countries.
Neither the EU as a whole nor individual member states can bring about change as such. As the case of Belarus suggests, it’s people power that might bring change. That’s how communist regimes from the Baltic states to Romania were toppled back in 1989.
Sooner or later, Lukashenko will leave his presidential palace. Sooner or later, Putin will leave the scene too. Sooner or later, a Hungarian opposition will defeat Fidesz, the ruling party that has systematically taken control of the media, of academic institutions, and of parts of the economy. Societies are not static.
It doesn’t mean that the EU should accept the status quo—which in Belarus is already changing by virtue of the scale of the protests, the broad mobilization of civil society, and the overcoming of fear.
As the Baltic States show, actively providing assistance to pro-democracy forces abroad means preparing, not just waiting, for the day after.
Comments(4)
Madame Dempsey neglects an important Document called „Helsinki Akte“ where interference in other Country is not allowed. That would be true for Ukraine, Turkey CIA assassination against President Erdogan. Interference in Belarus. Germany knows for sure that Trust in Poland is wasted. Poland and all Baltic States have Defence Budget of about 10 Billion. Compare to tiny Switzerland 5 Bio. Those Baltic States are 9 times the size of Switzerland. Poland got 120 Billion from EU over the last 12 Years. There is only one way and thats maintain good relation and Trade. German term: Wandel durch Handel. Those Baltic states not to mention Ukraine are very weak and relate for financial support.
It is indeed true as Judy writes "Sooner or later, Lukashenko will leave his presidential palace. Sooner or later, Putin will leave the scene too." But it is completely possible in the meantime that Alexei Navalny will somehow poison himself in prison and other of Navalny's supporters will be forced out of the country or disappear into Putin's prisons. Putin knows the lessons of Stalin, cut off the head of the opposition to cripple you opponents. No one should underestimate how ruthless Putin and his Mafia state can be before he departs the scene one way or another.
De Schutter, UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, just concluded that over 92.4 million EU people experienced poverty. This is also in the context of acceptable GINI coefficients, which means a more equitable distribution. Schutter referenced the ubiquitous Milton buccaneering, Singapore on Der Spree and sur la Seine: “EU member states all too often "compete with each other in very unhelpful ways”; “They race to the bottom by lowering taxes, wages, and worker protections because they think that's how they can attract investors and improve... competitiveness. The fight against poverty is the missing piece of this Green Deal even though it was presented as a key component”. 92.4 million people have been testing “how committed the EU is to its own values”. The EU had plenty of time and resources to commit to these, including the newly integrated countries mentioned in the article. It is unfortunate that again and again the author misses the essence of 5G – it is a technology developed with widely available, of the shelf knowledge and components, and the EU and US should have deployed it years ago, and export it to China. By now the EU should have been at quantum Internet, quantum communications running on quantum computers; molten salt fission reactors, functional ITER, and a long litany of technologies around the corner. Linkevičius should focus on what Lithuania (and all new members) can do for the EU, not what the NATO can do for them, above and beyond reediness to fight a strategic nuclear war for any forgotten hamlet and payback from deep time. What happened with vaccines is incomprehensible, and that should be the focus right now. The technology was there from the very beginning, yet India can produce more vaccines than the EU; Ukraine had to write to Biden, instead of the EU producing vaccine in Ukraine. Biden has promised the US electorate that his foreign policy will be focused on the middle class, which with Nuland and Blinken around remains to be seen. The EU was the one supposed to be the display of a thriving middle class, the best argument on winning hearts and minds all over the world. The International Bill of Human Rights doesn’t guarantee a thriving middle class, but that is what the West had when then Ford concluded the 1975 Helsinki Accords: “the lot the people in Eastern Europe will be that much better, and the cause of freedom will advance at least that far." It was never about posted workers and poverty in 2021, a UN report.
Woud it not be good idea if the baltic stes also looked INWARD at their own tratment of russian speaking minorities, at the same time as they worry about democracy in Russia? In addition, Some of them could addressmore openly the way they supported nazis and treated jews, a while ago. Estonia, for instance, has not ddressed the issue. Lithuania has ade some progress.
Comment Policy
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.